Anti-wind lobbyists falsely claim more than 1 in 20 wind turbines permanently inactive

Last update: September 13, 2013

There’s an anti-wind energy myth floating around that refuses to die. The most recent siting was in the official policy of an Australian political party, the Democratic Labour Party of Australia. [11] What is the myth?

That there are 14,000 permanently inactive wind turbines out there somewhere.

That last word, ‘somewhere’, is used advisedly. The 14,000 number has been applied to the entire world, the continental United States and the confines of the state of California. It’s a pretty flexible number and a pretty flexible and well-traveled myth.  That last version, that there are 14,000 inactive wind turbines in California alone, was the one that the Australian political party enshrined in their policy on wind energy.

Tory Aardvark, the climate-change denying bastion of disinformation likes the US only version, although their blog entry quotes the origination of the myth which talks about the world-wide number, so Aardvark manages to get it wrong twice in one post. [12] This level of inaccuracy is fairly typical of that anonymous blog, so it isn’t surprising.

The myth started with Andrew Walden, a Hawaiian anti-wind activist in early 2010.  He wrote an article starting with the Kamaoa Wind Farm in Hawaii that was heading for decommissioning and repowering and pulled the number of 14,000 permanently inactive wind turbines out of … somewhere.[13]

In the best wind spots on earth, over 14,000 turbines were simply abandoned.

He doesn’t make any effort to show how he arrived at this magical number. He doesn’t list sources. He doesn’t show calculations. He just comes up with 14,000 for the world through some magical process. You would think that the lack of any supporting evidence would prevent people from quoting and then exaggerating even his already wildly exaggerated claim. However, the quality of evidence doesn’t matter in the global warming denialist and anti-renewables crowd, what matters is the quotable claim.

So, what is an accurate number or methodology for determining the current number of permanently inactive wind turbines?

Short Answer:

A more realistic maximum number is at most 1% of installed wind turbines — perhaps 2,000 wind turbines — and perhaps 0.1% of generation capacity.  And the number of permanently inactive wind turbines is diminishing as they are replaced with working modern turbines.

Long Answer:

The sensible methodology to arrive at a very conservative — aka unreasonably large but defensible — number of permanently inactive wind turbine has a few steps.

  1. Calculate the worst-case ratio of inactive wind turbines
  2. Determine the total number of wind turbines
  3. Calculate the worst-case scenario using the ratio
  4. Assess generating capacity implications

What is a good way to calculate the worst-case ratio of inactive wind turbines?

There are about 5,000 wind turbines installed at Tehachapi Pass Wind Farm and of these, approximately 100 are inactive.[3] This ratio is 2%, and is at one of the oldest operational wind farms in the United States, where massive tax breaks combined with immature technology have created one of the highest ratios of inactive to active wind turbines in any location. The majority of the permanently inactive wind turbines were built in the early 1980’s and are very old technology. Of course, the inactive wind turbines are being replaced with new generation capacity as part of the Tehachapi Pass Renewable Transmission Project [4], so the number of dead turbines is going to drop substantially.

How many wind turbines are there?

According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), there are just under 240,000 working wind turbines as of Q1 2013. [9] 14,000 wind turbines permanently inactive would represent about 6% of the total installed base being inactive today.

What does this imply for the possible number of inactive wind turbines?

The number of 2% is likely much higher than the world wide reality, but if true would represent roughly 4,800 permanently inactive wind turbines.

A more reasonable but still very conservative upper limit of 1% would bring that down to a maximum of 2,400 permanently inactive wind turbines.

What percentage of generating capacity would these represent?

The inactive wind turbines would be much smaller than the typically 1.5 MW to 4.5 MW turbines currently installed, as typically it is older wind turbines that are out of production.  The average wind turbine size in 1990, about 20 years ago or the lifespan of a wind turbine, was 200 KW.  A little simple math says that conservatively these inactive wind turbines might represent 0.1% of total wind generation capacity.

Average wind turbine size in KW sold in different countries, source BTM Consult
Average wind turbine size in KW sold in different countries, source BTM Consult [7]

Are all wind turbines that aren’t spinning permanently inactive?

One thing sources who inflate the number of inactive wind turbines do is mistake temporarily inactive wind turbines for permanently inactive ones.  There are many reasons why a wind turbine might not be spinning despite the presence of wind, and the majority of these are in keeping with good grid management techniques.[5]

So, 14,000 permanently inactive wind turbines world-wide is gross hyperbole at roughly four times the worst case scenario, and becomes close to an order of magnitude of inflation when compared to a likely scenario. 14,000 wind turbines in the USA is laughably unrealistic; the US has about 20% of installed wind generation, so a more likely maximum number is 400 small, old wind turbines around the US. California is just funny, as there are about 14,000 wind turbines in total in that state, so 100% of them would have to be rusting in place for that claim to be true.

What’s the verdict?

14,000 is a number that has been conjured from thin air by an anti-wind advocate for rhetorical purposes. This type of shoddy and sensationalistic tactic is unfortunately typical.

In the meantime, Hawaii, where Walden saw an inactive wind farm and created his fantasy figure, is putting up more wind farms because they continue to make economic and environmental sense.[10] Most jurisdictions are seeing replacements of older and inactive wind turbines with modern technologies.[6], [8]


[3] What happens to a wind-farm once the turbines exceed their useful life?
[5] Wind Energy: In a field of wind turbines, why are there a few that do not move?
[10] First Wind project in Hawaii goes operational

Other Resources:

  1. Paul Gipe’s excellent debunking:  Debunking Anti-Wind Myth of 14000 Abandoned Wind Turbines in California

This material has been reproduced here:


  1. Phil De Troy · · Reply

    About 14 000, I guess more now, probably 30 000, near Palm Springs.
    They are more than 30 years old, very LOW power (from 10 kW each, I need 2 of them to heat my 68 sq.m. appartment in the winter). See in ref 1, The turbines on steel framework as shown above are Green Ridge Power park in the database the lowest level being 1476 100 kW turbines, the highest level being 410 300 kW turbines. This is NOT the right way to build a park, and the picture us over-zoomed, showing the park with the turbines much closer to each other than they are in the real world. Don’t panic, this is not a picture of our future environment, they have understood they were wrong and building now larger masts, close to 5 years old European standards, 120 to 150 m high, diameter 80 to 110 m, power 1500 to 2500 kW, and distante 4 diameters from each other. And indeed, when the new ones are operational, they stop the old ones and begin dismantling. However they produced energy for 30 years, where European wind farms are thought to be built for 20 years only.

    See,-116.614294&spn=0.04458,0.090809, masts are not much higher than electric power lines.

    In the US deserts you can also find hundreds of thousands old airplanes, an this is not an evidence that the principle of airplanes failed.
    Don’t make the same calculations on the number of cars build and “abandoned” since the beginning of XXth Century.

    1. No, many fewer than 14,000 or 30,000. That many have possibly been decommissioned worldwide, but that’s a lot different than sitting and not working.

      I believe that we are agreeing in principle, but disagreeing on numbers, however.

Be nice, be respectful, be relevant.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,229 other followers

%d bloggers like this: