Windstrument: another off-key wind energy ‘innovation’

On Quora recently, someone asked “Windstrument – yet another revolutionary wind turbine. Have they got it right?“. I answered, there and have reposted my answer here.

I have a set of 13 questions I always ask when confronted with yet-another-wind-energy-innovation to give it a quick sniff test. I asked these questions of the Windstrument based on publicly available information from their websiteTwitter feed, etc. For background on the questions, please see this material: Invest carefully: Wind innovations are rarely kosher.

This company manages a record 10 out of 13 red flags, beating even the remarkably bad Saphonian Saphon generator. It will be going in the place of shame at the bottom of the list of “wind innovations” I maintain here: Good and bad bets: new wind technologies rated. It’s also a dead venture as far as I can tell: the websites are dead or haven’t been updated for 14 months, and the Twitter feed updates stopped three months ago.

First off, though, what is the Windstrument? It’s a helical torque generating wind turbine, basically just a fancy farm water pump, one of those slatted disks familiar from western movies. They make the interesting claim that they can stack tons of these things side by side and around one another with no detrimental flow effects so that it is “easily and infinitely expandable”.

Technology Red Flags

  1. Do they claim to exceed Betz’ Limit? – Red Flag  – “average of 90% increase in captured energy”
  2. Is it an old technology claiming to be a new technology? – Red Flag – Helical wind turbines have been tried and failed in vertical and horizontal configurations in the past. They are straightforward torque generators with no aerodynamic efficiencies adding impetus, and as such are seriously restricted in generation capability.
  3. Is their product just a design concept as opposed to at least a working and tested prototype? – Green - They claim to have done wind tunnel tests and show pictures of physical devices.
  4. Are the only test results from tests that they have performed as opposed to independent, third-party labs, and do they expose the numbers? – Red Flag – no published numbers exist. Claims are solely that, claims. No independent organization testing is asserted.
  5. Are claimed patents for devices other than the one they are demonstrating? = Green – US Patent US8226369 B2 is actually for the device described in press material. Note that there about a dozen other helical wind turbines patented as well.
  6. Are they claiming greater efficiency than existing generation technologies based on anything other than an ISO standard full lifecycle accounting that has been independently assessed? – RED FLAG – Yes, they are claiming “that is price competitive with standard energy sources.” however they have no price list and no published LCA. They never got to manufacturing as far as I can tell.
  7. Are they claiming to integrate storage into their wind generation device without a market niche need? RED FLAG – Yes: “has an internal power storage capability”.  Note: this is a red flag for two reasons. It specifically addresses a myth related to utility-scale wind energy related to backup and energy storage is almost alway best done with a separate component as it will be cheaper.

Business Model Red Flags

  1. Do the principals have backgrounds entirely in fields unrelated to wind energy? RED FLAG - A plastics manufacture, a guy whose only claim to fame in wind energy is this helicoid wind whozit and having spent time on an Americas Cup boat, and a holding company that is now defunct – Unified Energies International
  2. Are they starting from a product as opposed to a specific and tightly targeted market niche? – RED FLAG – They make claims to be residential, urban, utility-scale, marine, etc. Their ineffective generator is the best choice for everything?
  3. Are they claiming that their product will replace utility-scale three-blade wind turbines? – RED FLAG – “Windstrument™ was developed for both residential use and utility scale projects”
  4. Does the product introduce major new liabilities e.g. downwind throw of solid flying wind turbines and cable, or varying flight obstructions? – Green

Marketing Red Flags

  1. Do they disparage other wind generation technologies to establish their technology’s superiority? – Red Flag – “quiet”, “bird safe”, “power storage”, “shadow flicker”, “safe for humans”, “do not have to build highways or cement/asphalt roads”, “only workable wind power solution for seafaring vessels”
  2. Do they have a web-site that is just a facade or is missing entirely? – RED FLAG – website is a dead facade that points to the website, which hasn’t been updated since 8/7/2012.



One comment

  1. I’ve gotten in a couple arguments online with other people posting ‘revolutionary’ wind turbines that didn’t pass my smell test. I told one advocate that the model he was showing looked like it had NO connection to any kind of generating device, and until it was, it was basically yard art…a windspinner. He didn’t like that and some others jumped on me as well, but I also pointed out that he was making all sorts of wild claims, of high efficiency, doesn’t kill birds, no need for high towers, etc. And he disparaged existing large scale turbines, which are being upgraded and improved at a a fast rate. It was like he took a list from an anti-wind page and said, ‘yup, MY turbine doesn’t do that.” I felt sorry for the people who were asking for info on how they can ‘invest’.
    I saw one proposed system that was being shared on several sites, that consisted of little plastic fans in an array that looked like it was made of 2×4’s. They also did that ‘infinitely expandable’ nonsense. If you want a good laugh, just go to Youtube and search for wind turbines. I don’t disparage experimentation, and welcome innovation, but showing a picture of a Hot Wheels is not the same as inventing the ‘fastest car in the world…doesn’t need gasoline…goes forever on zero point energy…THEY don’t want you to know about this…yada yada.”

Be nice, be respectful, be relevant.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,229 other followers

%d bloggers like this: